Barros v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Barros v. City of New York

66 A.D.2d 523, 885 N.Y.S.2d 909

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 66 A.D.2d 523 (Barros v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barros v. City of New York, 66 A.D.2d 523, 885 N.Y.S.2d 909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mark Friedlander, J.), entered July 22, 2008, which denied defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Appellant failed to make a prima facie showing eliminating all material issues of fact from the case (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]). Concur— Andrias, J.P., Sweeny, Nardelli, Richter and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mark Friedlander, J.), entered July 22, 2008, which denied defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Appellant failed to make a prima facie showing eliminating all material issues of fact from the case (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]). Concur— Andrias, J.P., Sweeny, Nardelli, Richter and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 A.D.2d 523, 885 N.Y.S.2d 909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barros-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack