Barron v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Barron v. State

270 S.W. 1021, 99 Tex. Crim. 551

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 1, 1925

DocketNo. 8802.

StatusPublished

This text of 270 S.W. 1021 (Barron v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barron v. State, 270 S.W. 1021, 99 Tex. Crim. 551 (Tex. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas county of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a single bill of exceptions. The State’s evidence sufficiently shows the commission of the offense. Appellant defended on the proposition of an alibi. This defense was submitted to the jury and by them solved adversely to the contention of the appellant.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas county of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a single bill of exceptions. The State’s evidence sufficiently shows the commission of the offense. Appellant defended on the proposition of an alibi. This defense was submitted to the jury and by them solved adversely to the contention of the appellant.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

270 S.W. 1021, 99 Tex. Crim. 551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barron-v-state-texcrimapp-1925.