Barron v. Craighead County Detention Center
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION DEURSLA LASHAY BARRON PLAINTIFF #41580 v. CASE NO. 3:25-CV-00142-BSM CRAIGHEAD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, et al DEFENDANTS ORDER After careful review of the record, Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney’s recommended disposition [Doc. No. 9] is adopted, and Deursla Barron’s amended complaint [Doc. No. 7] is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. See Sanders v. Sears, Roebuck, & Co., 984 F.2d 972, 976 (8th Cir. 1993) (municipal employees are not liable in their official capacity unless the plaintiff shows that a policy, custom, or deliberate indifference caused her injury). It is recommended that this dismissal count as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. section 1915(g). Further, an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of September, 2025.
Brrr 2 A I9a_ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barron v. Craighead County Detention Center (Barron v. Craighead County Detention Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.