Barron v. Barron

Missouri Court of Appeals

Barron v. Barron

809 S.W.2d 126, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 498, 1991 WL 47575

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 9, 1991·No. No. 58032·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from an order denying his motion to set aside a default judgment in a dissolution decree. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from an order denying his motion to set aside a default judgment in a dissolution decree. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Barron v. Barron, 809 S.W.2d 126, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 498, 1991 WL 47575 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

809 S.W.2d 126 (Barron v. Barron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.