Barron, Gus
This text of Barron, Gus (Barron, Gus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-88,801-01
EX PARTE GUS BARRON, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. D-1-DC-10-302618-A IN THE 403RD DISTRICT COURT FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of assault family
violence and sentenced to sixteen years’ imprisonment. The Third Court of Appeals affirmed his
conviction. Barron v. State, No. 03-11-00519-CR (Tex. App.—Austin Jul. 26, 2013) (not designated
for publication).
Applicant contends, among other things, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance
because he did not object to inclusion of improper “duty to retreat” language in the self defense
portion of the jury charge. 2
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these
circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294
(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court
shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The
trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the
appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.
If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the
performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient
performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and
conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for
habeas corpus relief.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing the jury
charge from trial, all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes
from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and
conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any
extensions of time must be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. 3
Filed: October 3, 2018 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Barron, Gus, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barron-gus-texcrimapp-2018.