Barron Collins v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 20, 2017
Docket01-17-00115-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Barron Collins v. State (Barron Collins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barron Collins v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Opinion issued April 20, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-17-00114-CR NO. 01-17-00115-CR ——————————— BARRON COLLINS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case Nos. 1483440; 1483469

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Barron Collins, pleaded guilty in cause number 1483440 to the

offense of evading arrest or detention and burglary of a habitation. In accordance

with the terms of a plea-bargain agreement, the trial court sentenced appellant to

6 years’ incarceration. Appellant also pleaded guilty in cause number 1483469 to the offense of burglary of a habitation. In accordance with the terms of a plea-bargain

agreement, the trial court sentenced appellant in that cause to 6 years’ incarceration,

with the two sentences to run concurrently. Appellant filed a notice of appeal.

In a plea-bargain case, a defendant may appeal only those matters that were

raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s

permission to appeal. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 44.02; TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).

An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has the

right of appeal has not been made part of the record. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

Here, the trial court’s certifications are included in the records on appeal. The

certifications state that these are plea-bargain cases and that the defendant has no

right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record supports the trial court’s

certifications. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss these appeals. See Chavez

v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss any

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Massengale.

2 Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Chavez v. State
183 S.W.3d 675 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Barron Collins v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barron-collins-v-state-texapp-2017.