Barroilhet v. Fisch

63 Cal. 462, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 497
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJune 4, 1883
StatusPublished

This text of 63 Cal. 462 (Barroilhet v. Fisch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barroilhet v. Fisch, 63 Cal. 462, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 497 (Cal. 1883).

Opinion

Sharpstein, J.

In Dresbach v. His Creditors, 63 Cal. 187, it was held that the Code which provides for “assignments for the benefit of creditors ” (Civ. Code, tit. 3, part 2, div. 4), was not repealed by the insolvent law of 1880, which contains a provision that all acts and parts of acts in conflict with it are repealed.

Conceding that the assignor in some instances inventoried his indebtedness to some of the creditors, for whose benefit said assignment was made, too high, we think, in the absence of any evidence that it was designedly done, the assignment should not be held void for that reason. A mere mistake of computation ought not to vitiate such an assignment, and we are not prepared to say from an inspection of the record that there is anything more than that apparent in this case. The court below found that there was not, and we must presume that the evidence justified that finding unless the contrary appears.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Myrick, J., McKee, J., Thoretoe, J., and McKiebtry, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dresbach v. His Creditors
63 Cal. 187 (California Supreme Court, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 Cal. 462, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barroilhet-v-fisch-cal-1883.