Barroga v. Board of Administration California Public Retirement System
This text of 168 F. App'x 777 (Barroga v. Board of Administration California Public Retirement System) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Lucio A. Barroga appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his request that a three-judge panel of the district court consider whether he properly served the summons and complaint. Barroga’s request for a three-judge panel followed the district judge’s denial of Barroga’s motion for entry of default judgment. As the district court’s order did not end the proceedings, and is not an appealable interlocutory order, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
DISMISSED
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
168 F. App'x 777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barroga-v-board-of-administration-california-public-retirement-system-ca9-2006.