Barrister Associates v. Belloff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Barrister Associates v. Belloff

277 A.D.2d 335, 716 N.Y.S.2d 340, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12095

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 20, 2000·Published

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lally, J.), dated March 27, 2000, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 to vacate an order of the same court, dated August 30, 1999, granting the plaintiff’s application to strike his answer upon his default in appearing at a court conference, and directed an inquest on the issue of damages.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A defendant attempting to vacate a default must establish both a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense (see, Rodriguez v Read, 266 AD2d 271; Roussodimou v Zafiriadis, 238 AD2d 568). The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion to vacate his default as he failed to [336] demonstrate that he had a meritorious defense to the plaintiffs action. O’Brien, J. P., Thompson, H. Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lally, J.), dated March 27, 2000, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 to vacate an order of the same court, dated August 30, 1999, granting the plaintiff’s application to strike his answer upon his default in appearing at a court conference, and directed an inquest on the issue of damages.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A defendant attempting to vacate a default must establish both a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense (see, Rodriguez v Read, 266 AD2d 271; Roussodimou v Zafiriadis, 238 AD2d 568). The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion to vacate his default as he failed to [336] demonstrate that he had a meritorious defense to the plaintiffs action. O’Brien, J. P., Thompson, H. Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Barrister Associates v. Belloff, 277 A.D.2d 335, 716 N.Y.S.2d 340, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12095 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

277 A.D.2d 335 (Barrister Associates v. Belloff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related