Barrish v. Barrish
208 So. 2d 464, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5765
Opinion
Affirmed. See Grossman v. Grossman, Fla.1956, 90 So.2d 115; Chesnut v. Chesnut, 160 Fla. 83, 33 So.2d 730 (1948); McDade v. McDade, 107 Fla. 552, 146 So. 228 (1933); Musso v. Musso, Fla.App.1965, 171 So.2d 922; and Dings v. Dings, Fla.App.1964, 161 So.2d 227.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barrish v. Barrish, 208 So. 2d 464, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5765 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).
208 So. 2d 464 (Barrish v. Barrish) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dings v. Dings
161 So. 2d 227 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Grossman v. Grossman
90 So. 2d 115 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)
McDade v. McDade
146 So. 228 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Chesnut v. Chesnut
33 So. 2d 730 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1948)
Musso v. Musso
171 So. 2d 922 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)