Barris v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Florida

Barris v. Thompson

174 So. 908, 131 Fla. 245, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 850

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 29, 1936·Published

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of record of the judgment herein, and briefs, and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of record of the judgment herein, and briefs, and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.

Barris v. Thompson, 174 So. 908, 131 Fla. 245, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 850 (Fla. 1936).

Pincite

174 So. 908 (Barris v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.