Barris, J. v. Stroud Twp.
This text of Barris, J. v. Stroud Twp. (Barris, J. v. Stroud Twp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
JONATHAN BARRIS, : No. 363 MAL 2021 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v. : Commonwealth Court : : STROUD TOWNSHIP, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 6th day of June, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issue, as rephrased, is:
Whether an ordinance that limits target shooting to two non-residential zoning districts, and thus does not provide for shooting ranges at all private residences, is facially unconstitutional under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution? In addressing this issue, the parties are directed to discuss in their briefs the
following subsidiary matters: (1) whether this Court should adopt the two-step framework
for addressing Second Amendment challenges utilized by the lower court; (2) whether the
core Second Amendment right to possess firearms for self-defense recognized in District
of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), also implies a corresponding right to acquire
and maintain proficiency in their use; (3) whether such a corresponding right, if it exists,
must extend to one’s own home; and (4) the level of scrutiny courts should apply when
reviewing enactments that burden individuals’ ability to maintain firearms proficiency.
Justice Brobson did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Barris, J. v. Stroud Twp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barris-j-v-stroud-twp-pa-2022.