Barrino v. United States of America White House Administration

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedOctober 30, 2009
DocketCivil Action No. 2009-2040
StatusPublished

This text of Barrino v. United States of America White House Administration (Barrino v. United States of America White House Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barrino v. United States of America White House Administration, (D.D.C. 2009).

Opinion

ml

F:Lep

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 3 0 mag Clerk, _ - .

Tony Curtis Barrino, § Bankt'}'ui.t?l£sé'¢'>‘t(.ilt't:nd

Plaintiff, §

v. § Civil Action No. 4 0

President Barack Obama et al., §

Defendants. §

MEl\/IORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiffs pro se complaint and application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the Court is required to dismiss a complaint upon a determination that it, among other grounds, is frivolous. 28 U.S.C. § l9l5(e)(2)(B)(i).

Plaintiff, a resident of Hyattsville, Maryland, sues President Barack Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and White House Press Secretary Robert Gibb "on the grounds that my life and well being is [sic] [in] immediate danger due to the fact that all parties named are . . . using their political power abusively and conducted a state dept. level investigation while knowing . . . that I have diplomatic immunity , . . ." C0mpl. at 2. The rest of the complaint is a series of illogical statements. Comp1aints that describe fantastic or delusional scenarios or contain ‘“fanciful factual allegation[s]" are subject to dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(€)(2). Neitzke v, Williams, 490 U.S. 3l9, 325 (1989); accord Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330-31 (D.C. Cir. 1994),

This complaint qualifies for such treatment and, thus, is dismissed. A separate Order

ii§ted States District Ju§ge

accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

Date: Octobevq b , 2009

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tony Best v. Sharon Pratt Kelly, Mayor
39 F.3d 328 (D.C. Circuit, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Barrino v. United States of America White House Administration, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrino-v-united-states-of-america-white-house-adm-dcd-2009.