Barrino v. Collins
This text of Barrino v. Collins (Barrino v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FILED OCT 3 0 2009 ) Clerk, us. Tony Curtis Barrino, ) Bankr~p't DIstrict and ) cy COurts Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C IVI'1 A' N o. · chon OD 2042 ) Heidi Collins et aI., ) ) Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff s pro se complaint and
application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the Court is
required to dismiss a complaint upon a determination that it, among other grounds, is frivolous.
28 U.S.c. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).
Plaintiff, a resident of Hyattsville, Maryland, sues three employees of "Cable Network
News" and a member of the United States Air Force "on grounds of conspiracy [sic] to commit
extortion, conspircy [sic] to commit physocolocial [sic] damages-distress and mental anuguish
[sic] .... " CompI. at 2. The rambling complaint consists of a series of illogical statements and a
demand for damages exceeding $60 trillion. Complaints that describe fantastic or delusional
scenarios or contain "fanciful factual allegation[s]" are subject to dismissal under 28 U.S.c.
§ 1915(e)(2). Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989); accord Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328,
330-31 (D.C. Cir. 1994). This complaint qualifies for such treatment and, thus, is dismissed. A
separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
United States Districlige Date: October c::ath, 2009
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Barrino v. Collins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrino-v-collins-dcd-2009.