Barrington v. State

32 S.W.2d 837, 116 Tex. Crim. 11, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 633
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 26, 1930
DocketNo. 13734.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 32 S.W.2d 837 (Barrington v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barrington v. State, 32 S.W.2d 837, 116 Tex. Crim. 11, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 633 (Tex. 1930).

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Aggravated assault is the offense; penalty, fine of $25.00.

The prosecution is by complaint and information. The affidavit to the complaint purports to have been taken before the county attorney, but the jurat does not bear his signature. As a basis for the prosecution upon an information, a complaint supported by affidavit is essential. Art. 415, C. C. P. See Vernon’s Ann. Tex. C. C. P., Vol. 1, p. 313; also Stacy v. State, 258 S. W. 487, and authorities therein cited.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Hawkins, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Purcell v. State
317 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1958)
Stanley v. State
158 S.W.2d 785 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 S.W.2d 837, 116 Tex. Crim. 11, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrington-v-state-texcrimapp-1930.