Barrington v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Barrington v. State

101 So. 91, 20 Ala. App. 68, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 153

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 17, 1924

Docket7 Div. 50.

StatusPublished

This text of 101 So. 91 (Barrington v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barrington v. State, 101 So. 91, 20 Ala. App. 68, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 153 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

We have examined the facts as set out in the bill of exceptions, and are of the opinion that they are not sufficient to sustain a judgment of conviction. It is but fair to state that the Attorney General concedes this to he the case.

The affirmative charge should have been given as requested, and for the error in its refusal the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

We have examined the facts as set out in the bill of exceptions, and are of the opinion that they are not sufficient to sustain a judgment of conviction. It is but fair to state that the Attorney General concedes this to he the case.

The affirmative charge should have been given as requested, and for the error in its refusal the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 So. 91, 20 Ala. App. 68, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrington-v-state-alactapp-1924.