Barrington v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Barrington v. State

101 So. 91, 20 Ala. App. 68, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 153

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 17, 1924·No. 7 Div. 50.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

We have examined the facts as set out in the bill of exceptions, and are of the opinion that they are not sufficient to sustain a judgment of conviction. It is but fair to state that the Attorney General concedes this to he the case.

The affirmative charge should have been given as requested, and for the error in its refusal the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

We have examined the facts as set out in the bill of exceptions, and are of the opinion that they are not sufficient to sustain a judgment of conviction. It is but fair to state that the Attorney General concedes this to he the case.

The affirmative charge should have been given as requested, and for the error in its refusal the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Barrington v. State, 101 So. 91, 20 Ala. App. 68, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 153 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

101 So. 91 (Barrington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.