Barrington v. Dunwody

134 S.E. 130, 35 Ga. App. 517, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 964
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 16, 1926·No. 17095·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

A majority of the court holds, upon the authority of Garfunkel v. Byck, 28 Ga. App. 651 (113 S. E. 95), that the court did not err in sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the plaintiff’s petition.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Luke, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barrington v. Dunwody, 134 S.E. 130, 35 Ga. App. 517, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 964 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

134 S.E. 130 (Barrington v. Dunwody) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oti Shelf, Inc. v. Schair & Associates, Inc.
517 S.E.2d 542 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1999)
Contract Management Consultants, Inc. v. Huddle House, Inc.
215 S.E.2d 326 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Stone v. Reinhard
183 S.E.2d 601 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
Bradbury v. Morrison
92 S.E.2d 607 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)
Mayo v. Lynes
55 S.E.2d 174 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Thompson v. Hudson
47 S.E.2d 112 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Irish v. Fisher
40 S.E.2d 588 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1946)
Ocean Lake & River Fish Co. v. Dotson
28 S.E.2d 319 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1943)
Brenner v. Spiegle
157 N.E. 491 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1927)