BARRINGTON ALFRED v. JEFFREY B. DEZIEL

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 2, 2022
Docket21-1329
StatusPublished

This text of BARRINGTON ALFRED v. JEFFREY B. DEZIEL (BARRINGTON ALFRED v. JEFFREY B. DEZIEL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
BARRINGTON ALFRED v. JEFFREY B. DEZIEL, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

BARRINGTON ALFRED, individually, Appellant,

v.

JEFFREY B. DEZIEL, individually, Appellee.

No. 4D21-1329

[June 2, 2022]

Appeal from the County Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Kathleen H. Roberts, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2021CC000402.

Barrington Alfred, Stuart, pro se.

John W. Madden, Jr. of John Madden, P.A., Stuart, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, GERBER and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
BARRINGTON ALFRED v. JEFFREY B. DEZIEL, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrington-alfred-v-jeffrey-b-deziel-fladistctapp-2022.