Barringer v. State
Opinion
Appellant was charged with two counts of burglary, possession of marijuana and sale of marijuana. He pleaded guilty to the charges and was sentenced to a single general sentence of four years. The trial judge did not specify whether the sentence was predicated upon one, some, or all of the charges.
The imposition of a single judgment and sentence upon a defendant lawfully found guilty of two or more separate crimes is improper. See Dorfman v. State, 351 So.2d 954 (Fla.1977).
Although the possession and sale conviction arose out of a single transaction, a separate sentence should be imposed upon each. See Fundak v. State, 358 So.2d 1195 (Fla.2d DCA 1978). A separate sentence should also be imposed upon each of the burglary charges.
The cause is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
362 So. 2d 166 (Barringer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.