Barringer v. Bratcher

118 S.W. 1015, 90 Ark. 214, 1909 Ark. LEXIS 448
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedApril 26, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 118 S.W. 1015 (Barringer v. Bratcher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barringer v. Bratcher, 118 S.W. 1015, 90 Ark. 214, 1909 Ark. LEXIS 448 (Ark. 1909).

Opinion

Wood, J.,

(after stating the facts). The recitals of the decree show that the cause was heard upon oral evidence, and that “sixty days were given the defendants in which to prepare and file their bill of exceptions.” We find no bill of exceptions in the record, and nothing in the record proper to show that the decree of the court was erroneous. Where the record shows that the cause in chancery was heard upon oral evidence, and such evidence is not brought into the record by bill of exceptions or otherwise, and there is nothing on the face of the record itself to show that the court erred, it will be presumed that the decree is correct. Murphy v. Citizens’ Bank of Junction City, 84 Ark. 100.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCarson v. Hankins
180 S.W.2d 830 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1944)
Whatley v. Whatley
170 S.W.2d 600 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1943)
Smith v. Pettus, Curator
169 S.W.2d 586 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1943)
Bradley Lumber Co. v. Hamilton
159 S.W. 35 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1913)
Diggs v. Diggs
129 S.W. 793 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 S.W. 1015, 90 Ark. 214, 1909 Ark. LEXIS 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barringer-v-bratcher-ark-1909.