Barrier v. Kelly
81 Miss. 266
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
We cannot take cognizance of this appeal because it has no warrant of law. The same order sustains a demurrer to the bill, gives sixty days to amend it, and yet allows an appeal to “ settle the principles of the case. ” Non constat but appellant would conclude to amend. He may have done so, for aught we know, since June 20th, the date of the decree.
In order that a decree may be appealed from, it must be final as to its subject.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barrier v. Kelly, 81 Miss. 266 (Mich. 1902).
81 Miss. 266 (Barrier v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Turner v. Carter
132 So. 333 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1931)
Carothers v. Bank of Baldwyn
131 So. 111 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1930)
Blum v. Planters' Bank & Trust Co. of Opelousas
122 So. 784 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1929)
Maxey v. Goolsby
98 So. 99 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1923)
Gulf & Ship Island Railroad v. Williams
68 So. 776 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1915)
Moore v. Evans
54 So. 438 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1910)