Barrie v. Dana

New York Supreme Court

Barrie v. Dana

20 Johns. 307

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1822

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 20 Johns. 307 (Barrie v. Dana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barrie v. Dana, 20 Johns. 307 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1822).

Pincite

Opinion

Spencer, Ch. J.

It has been the established and invariable practice of this Court, for more than thirty years, to require the judgment-roll to be filed with the clerk, before issuing execution. It is, therefore, unnecessary to take notice of the practice of the English Courts. The motion to set aside the execution ought to be granted, on the defendant’s stipulating not to bring an action for false imprisonment.

Per totam Curiam.

Rule accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spencer, Ch. J.

It has been the established and invariable practice of this Court, for more than thirty years, to require the judgment-roll to be filed with the clerk, before issuing execution. It is, therefore, unnecessary to take notice of the practice of the English Courts. The motion to set aside the execution ought to be granted, on the defendant’s stipulating not to bring an action for false imprisonment.

Per totam Curiam.

Rule accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Johns. 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrie-v-dana-nysupct-1822.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack