Barrie v. Dana
20 Johns. 307
Opinion
It has been the established and invariable practice of this Court, for more than thirty years, to require the judgment-roll to be filed with the clerk, before issuing execution. It is, therefore, unnecessary to take notice of the practice of the English Courts. The motion to set aside the execution ought to be granted, on the defendant’s stipulating not to bring an action for false imprisonment.
Per totam Curiam.
Rule accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barrie v. Dana, 20 Johns. 307 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1822).
20 Johns. 307 (Barrie v. Dana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Morris v. . Patchin
24 N.Y. 394 (New York Court of Appeals, 1862)
Wells v. Stout
9 Cal. 479 (California Supreme Court, 1858)
Townshend v. Wesson
11 Duer 342 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1855)
Williams v. Wheeler
1 Barb. 48 (New York Supreme Court, 1847)
Clute v. Clute
4 Denio 241 (New York Supreme Court, 1847)
Bank of Rochester v. Emerson
10 Paige Ch. 115 (New York Court of Chancery, 1843)
Frazer v. Carpenter
9 F. Cas. 731 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan, 1840)