Barretta v. Otis Elevator Co.
682 A.2d 997, 239 Conn. 909, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 364
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 18, 1996
DocketSC 15516
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 682 A.2d 997 (Barretta v. Otis Elevator Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Barretta v. Otis Elevator Co., 682 A.2d 997, 239 Conn. 909, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 364 (Colo. 1996).
Opinion
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 41 Conn. App. 856 (AC 14659), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the judgment must be reversed because of the failure of the trial court to charge on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Barretta v. Otis Elevator Co.
698 A.2d 810 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1997)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
682 A.2d 997, 239 Conn. 909, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barretta-v-otis-elevator-co-conn-1996.