Barretta v. Otis Elevator Co.

682 A.2d 997, 239 Conn. 909, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 364
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 18, 1996·No. SC 15516·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 41 Conn. App. 856 (AC 14659), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the judgment must be reversed because of the failure of the trial court to charge on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barretta v. Otis Elevator Co., 682 A.2d 997, 239 Conn. 909, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 364 (Colo. 1996).

682 A.2d 997 (Barretta v. Otis Elevator Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barretta v. Otis Elevator Co.
698 A.2d 810 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1997)