Barrett Wakefield and Howard Wakefield III v. Sam Ayers and Claudia Ayers
This text of Barrett Wakefield and Howard Wakefield III v. Sam Ayers and Claudia Ayers (Barrett Wakefield and Howard Wakefield III v. Sam Ayers and Claudia Ayers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-14-00648-CV Style: Barrett Wakefield and Howard Wakefield III v. Sam Ayers and Claudia Ayers Date motion filed*: November 19, 2014 Type of motion: Motion for extension of time to respond to notice Party filing motion: Appellant Barrett Wakefield Document to be filed: Response to Notice
Is appeal accelerated? No
If motion to extend time: Original due date: November 18, 2014 Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: Date Requested:
Ordered that motion is:
Granted in part If document is to be filed, document due: January 2, 2015 The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time absent extraordinary circumstances. Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ Appellants’ response to this Court’s notice of intent to dismiss, issued November 4, 2014, is due to be filed no later than January 2, 2015.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings
Panel consists of ____________________________________________
Date: December 4, 2014
November 7, 2008 Revision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Barrett Wakefield and Howard Wakefield III v. Sam Ayers and Claudia Ayers, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrett-wakefield-and-howard-wakefield-iii-v-sam-ayers-and-claudia-ayers-texapp-2014.