Barrett v. Western & Atlantic Railroad

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Barrett v. Western & Atlantic Railroad

94 S.E. 632, 21 Ga. App. 439, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 628

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 14, 1917

Docket8632

StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.E. 632 (Barrett v. Western & Atlantic Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barrett v. Western & Atlantic Railroad, 94 S.E. 632, 21 Ga. App. 439, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 628 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Wade, C. J.

1. In the absence of timely written requests therefor, there is no merit in those grounds of the motion for a new trial which complain of the failure of the court to give certain specific instructions. The charge was sufficiently full, and clearly submitted the issues to the jury.

2. There is no such substantial merit in any of the remaining special grounds óf the motion for a new trial as to require a reversal.

3. The evidence sufficiently sustains the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins and Luke,.JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI