Barrett v. United States
This text of 585 F. App'x 49 (Barrett v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Anthony C. Barrett appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his action filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b)(1) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barrett v. United States, No. 5:14-cv-00010-FPS-JSK, 2014 WL 4084187 (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 19, 2014). We dispense with oral argu[50]*50ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
585 F. App'x 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrett-v-united-states-ca4-2014.