Barrett v. Union Banking Co.
This text of 137 S.E. 14 (Barrett v. Union Banking Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Whenever it appears that the clerk of the trial court has failed to transmit to the Supreme Court, within the time prescribed by law, a bill of exceptions and transcript, and that an attorney for the plaintiff in error has been the cause of the delay, by consent, direc-, tion, or procurement of any kind, the writ of error will be dismissed. Civil Code, §§ 6185, 6186. Budden v. Brooks, 123 Ga. 882 (51 S. E. 727), and cit.; Wilson v. State, 124 Ga. 30 (52 S. E. 81) ; Wheeler v. Crawford, 135 Ga. 148 (69 S. E. 22); Moore v. State, 13 Ga. App. 32 (78 S. E. 774).
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
137 S.E. 14, 163 Ga. 893, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrett-v-union-banking-co-ga-1927.