Barrett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Barrett v. State

1936 OK CR 125, 62 P.2d 101, 60 Okla. Crim. 160, 1936 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 92

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided October 30, 1936·No. No. A-9116.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the county jail for a term of 30 days and a fine of $50, and appeals.

The petition in error and case-made was filed in this court on April 15, 1936. No brief has been filed in support of the defendant’s assignment of errors.

A careful examination of the record fails to disclose any fundamental or prejudicial errors. The evidence is sufficient to support the judgment.

The ease is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the county jail for a term of 30 days and a fine of $50, and appeals.

The petition in error and case-made was filed in this court on April 15, 1936. No brief has been filed in support of the defendant’s assignment of errors.

A careful examination of the record fails to disclose any fundamental or prejudicial errors. The evidence is sufficient to support the judgment.

The ease is therefore affirmed.

Barrett v. State, 1936 OK CR 125, 62 P.2d 101, 60 Okla. Crim. 160, 1936 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 92 (Okla. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

1936 OK CR 125 (Barrett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.