Barrett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Barrett v. State

1914 OK CR 67, 138 P. 1197, 10 Okla. Crim. 679, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 147

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided February 21, 1914·No. No. A-1941.·Published

Opinion

PEB CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted upon an information charging the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor to one Aaron Toby, and on the 27th day of January, 1913, in accordance with the verdict of the jury, he was sentenced to be confined thirty days in the county jail, and to pay a fine of one hundred dollars. No brief has been filed. We have examined the information, the instructions of the court, and the judgment and sentence, and we have discovered no error which will warrant a reversal of the judgment. The judgment is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEB CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted upon an information charging the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor to one Aaron Toby, and on the 27th day of January, 1913, in accordance with the verdict of the jury, he was sentenced to be confined thirty days in the county jail, and to pay a fine of one hundred dollars. No brief has been filed. We have examined the information, the instructions of the court, and the judgment and sentence, and we have discovered no error which will warrant a reversal of the judgment. The judgment is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Barrett v. State, 1914 OK CR 67, 138 P. 1197, 10 Okla. Crim. 679, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 147 (Okla. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

1914 OK CR 67 (Barrett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.