Barrett v. State
This text of 122 S.E. 83 (Barrett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
In each of these cases (in one of which the defendant was convicted of making intoxicating liquor, and in the other of’ possessing such liquor) the evidence amply authorized the conviction. The still was found in his hog lot and within a short distance from his house, and had been operated there for several months. The jury had a right to disbelieve the defendant’s statement, and, with his statement excluded,' the conviction was demanded.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
122 S.E. 83, 31 Ga. App. 771, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrett-v-state-gactapp-1924.