Barrett v. State
608 So. 2d 570, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12135, 1992 WL 338528
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Barrett v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 605 So. 2d 560 →
Opinion
We affirm the conviction but remand for resentencing. The court should correct the scoresheet by removing the multiple legal constraint points prior to resentencing. See Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 1058 (Fla.1991); Terry v. State, 588 So.2d 63 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); Horne v. State, 593 So.2d 309 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barrett v. State, 608 So. 2d 570, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12135, 1992 WL 338528 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
608 So. 2d 570 (Barrett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Horne v. State
593 So. 2d 309 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Terry v. State
588 So. 2d 63 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Flowers v. State
586 So. 2d 1058 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)