Barrett v. Somersworth

49 A. 1134, 70 N.H. 634
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedDecember 5, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 49 A. 1134 (Barrett v. Somersworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barrett v. Somersworth, 49 A. 1134, 70 N.H. 634 (N.H. 1900).

Opinion

Case, for injuries caused by a defective highway. Verdict for-the plaintiff. The plaintiff’s counsel, in his closing argument to the jury, stated that in consequence of the advice of the doctor upon whom the husband of the plaintiff called on the night of the accident, the husband took her home and applied hot and" cold water to her back, sat up with her all night, and at his earliest convenience in the morning employed a doctor. The defendants excepted on the ground that the statement was not warranted by the evidence. It appearing that the statement was fully justified by the evidence, the exception was overruled upon the plaintiff’s, motion, “ as frivolous, vexatious, and groundless,” and judgment ordered on the verdict.

Young, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 A. 1134, 70 N.H. 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrett-v-somersworth-nh-1900.