Barrett v. Reed

363 So. 2d 14
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 12, 1978
DocketJJ-58
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 363 So. 2d 14 (Barrett v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barrett v. Reed, 363 So. 2d 14 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

363 So.2d 14 (1978)

Gary Dean BARRETT, Appellant,
v.
Edward Thomas REED et Ux., Appellees.

No. JJ-58.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 12, 1978.
Rehearing Denied October 26, 1978.

*15 Ned N. Julian, Jr. of Stenstrom, Davis & McIntosh, Sanford, for appellant.

Dale K. Bohner of Coble, McKinnon, Rothert, Bohner & Godbee, Daytona Beach, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

An appeal from an order granting adoption of appellant's natural son to the mother and her new husband. We find insufficient evidence of abandonment and reverse.

The record reveals that appellant made no child support payments to his son for the 17 months between the dissolution of his marriage to the mother and the time of the hearing on this petition. Testimony also established, however, that the mother had moved with the child three times during that 17 month period without informing appellant of their whereabouts. Further, appellant inquired of the mother's relatives and they denied knowing her address.

We find that the record does not at this point support a finding of abandonment sufficient to justify a permanent severance of parental ties between appellant and his son. Neither party satisfied their mutual obligations here. While it is true that appellant was neglectful in maintaining contact with his son, it is also true that the mother failed in her duty to inform the father of changes in the child's address so that he could maintain such contact. Therefore, without prejudice to any future action based on additional facts, we reverse the trial court's order of adoption.

REVERSED.

SMITH, Acting C.J., and MELVIN, J., concur.

BOOTH, J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

GT v. Adoption of AET
725 So. 2d 404 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Hinkle v. Lindsey
424 So. 2d 983 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Wylie v. Botos
416 So. 2d 1253 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
In re the Adoption of King
373 So. 2d 384 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
363 So. 2d 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrett-v-reed-fladistctapp-1978.