Barrett v. Nichols

107 S.W. 171, 85 Ark. 58, 1908 Ark. LEXIS 481
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJanuary 6, 1908
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 107 S.W. 171 (Barrett v. Nichols) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barrett v. Nichols, 107 S.W. 171, 85 Ark. 58, 1908 Ark. LEXIS 481 (Ark. 1908).

Opinion

McCulloch, J.

This is an action instituted by appellee, Nichols, in the common pleas court of Prairie County against appellant to recover the sum of $28.50 alleged to be due for labor performed by appellee for one Peters on the latter’s farm.

The complaint states that appellee assisted, by his labor performed under contract with Peters, in producing a crop of corn and cotton on said farm, and that appellant, with notice of appellee’s lien as a laborer, purchased from Peters and shipped out of the State two bales of the cotton produced. This is an action to enforce appellee’s lien on the cotton. The common pleas court, and also the circuit court when the case reached there on appeal, overruled a demurrer to the complaint.

The allegations of the complaint are sufficient to show that appellee had a lien on the cotton received by appellant, but not sufficient to constitute a cause of action at law against appellant to recover the proceeds of the cotton. His remedy was to follow the crop by attachment in a suit at law or to sue in equity to recover the proceeds. Reavis v. Barnes, 36 Ark. 575; Judge v. Curtis, 72 Ark. 132.

The cases just cited relate to the enforcement of liens of landlords on crops produced, but the statute giving laborers a lien for the product of their labor and providing' for the enforcement thereof does not change the nature of the remedy against purchasers of the property.

Reversed and remanded with directions to sustain the demurrer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scroggins v. Bowen
464 S.W.2d 79 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1971)
McKay v. Millner
183 S.W.2d 780 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1944)
Wright v. Wooldridge
126 S.W. 841 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 S.W. 171, 85 Ark. 58, 1908 Ark. LEXIS 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrett-v-nichols-ark-1908.