Barrett v. McHugh
128 Mass. 165, 1880 Mass. LEXIS 29
Opinion
This case is governed by Ileywood v. Stiles, 124 Mass. 275. There was evidence, proper to be considered by the presiding justice who tried the case without a jury, tending to show that the goods for which this suit is brought were sold upon the sole credit of the defendant, and that he was liable as an original promisor, and not as a guarantor. Upon this question, the finding of the justice is conclusive, and we cannot revise it.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barrett v. McHugh, 128 Mass. 165, 1880 Mass. LEXIS 29 (Mass. 1880).
128 Mass. 165 (Barrett v. McHugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Irving Tanning Co. v. Shir
3 N.E.2d 841 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1936)
Hammond Coal Co. v. Lewis
143 N.E. 309 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1924)
Kesler and Dodson v. Cheadle
1903 OK 12 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1903)
Brownville Maine Slate Co. v. Hill
56 N.E. 706 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1900)
Mackey v. Smith
28 P. 974 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1892)
Pettengill v. Shoenbar
24 A. 584 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1891)
Chase v. Jones
84 Me. 107 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1891)
Rottman v. Fix
25 Mo. App. 571 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1887)
Larson v. Jensen
19 N.W. 130 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1884)