Barrett v. Marschak

Appellate Court of Illinois

Barrett v. Marschak

192 Ill. App. 481

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedApril 28, 1915

DocketGen. No. 20,312

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 192 Ill. App. 481 (Barrett v. Marschak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barrett v. Marschak, 192 Ill. App. 481 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Baume

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Replevin, § 204*—when receipt admissible in connection with return. 'Where the return of the sheriff to a writ of replevin specifically refers to the receipt thereon indorsed for a description of the property returned, such receipt may be considered as part of the record in connection with the return, and is admissible in evidence in an action upon the bond for the purpose of showing that all of the property mentioned in the writ was not in fact delivered to the replevin plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Baume

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Replevin, § 204*—when receipt admissible in connection with return. 'Where the return of the sheriff to a writ of replevin specifically refers to the receipt thereon indorsed for a description of the property returned, such receipt may be considered as part of the record in connection with the return, and is admissible in evidence in an action upon the bond for the purpose of showing that all of the property mentioned in the writ was not in fact delivered to the replevin plaintiff.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 Ill. App. 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrett-v-marschak-illappct-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack