Barrett v. Marschak

Appellate Court of Illinois

Barrett v. Marschak

192 Ill. App. 481

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided April 28, 1915·No. Gen. No. 20,312·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Baume

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Replevin, § 204*—when receipt admissible in connection with return. 'Where the return of the sheriff to a writ of replevin specifically refers to the receipt thereon indorsed for a description of the property returned, such receipt may be considered as part of the record in connection with the return, and is admissible in evidence in an action upon the bond for the purpose of showing that all of the property mentioned in the writ was not in fact delivered to the replevin plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Baume

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Replevin, § 204*—when receipt admissible in connection with return. 'Where the return of the sheriff to a writ of replevin specifically refers to the receipt thereon indorsed for a description of the property returned, such receipt may be considered as part of the record in connection with the return, and is admissible in evidence in an action upon the bond for the purpose of showing that all of the property mentioned in the writ was not in fact delivered to the replevin plaintiff.

Barrett v. Marschak, 192 Ill. App. 481 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

192 Ill. App. 481 (Barrett v. Marschak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related