Barrett v. Lewiston, Brunswick & Bath Street Railway Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Barrett v. Lewiston, Brunswick & Bath Street Railway Co.

92 A. 934, 113 Me. 562, 1915 Me. LEXIS 87

DecidedFebruary 11, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 92 A. 934 (Barrett v. Lewiston, Brunswick & Bath Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barrett v. Lewiston, Brunswick & Bath Street Railway Co., 92 A. 934, 113 Me. 562, 1915 Me. LEXIS 87 (Me. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an action to recover damages for injuries received by the plaintiff while riding upon defendant’s car as a passenger for hire. Three verdicts for the plaintiff have been set aside by this court; and another having been obtained by him, upon substantially the identical evidence offered in the other three cases, the defendant moves that this verdict also be set aside. No exceptions are presented. After a careful [563]*563examination of all the evidence in the case, and after giving thoughtful consideration to the able argument of counsel for the plaintiff, we still adhere to our former findings. Verdict set aside. Motion for new trial granted.

Oakes, Pulsifer & Ludden, for plaintiff. Newell & Skelton, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an action to recover damages for injuries received by the plaintiff while riding upon defendant’s car as a passenger for hire. Three verdicts for the plaintiff have been set aside by this court; and another having been obtained by him, upon substantially the identical evidence offered in the other three cases, the defendant moves that this verdict also be set aside. No exceptions are presented. After a careful [563]*563examination of all the evidence in the case, and after giving thoughtful consideration to the able argument of counsel for the plaintiff, we still adhere to our former findings. Verdict set aside. Motion for new trial granted.

Oakes, Pulsifer & Ludden, for plaintiff. Newell & Skelton, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 A. 934, 113 Me. 562, 1915 Me. LEXIS 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrett-v-lewiston-brunswick-bath-street-railway-co-me-1915.