Barrett v. Haia
This text of Barrett v. Haia (Barrett v. Haia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 28-NOV-2022 12:04 PM Dkt. 12 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ________________________________________________________________
GUY BARRETT and RONETTE BARRETT, Petitioners,
vs.
THE HONORABLE THOMAS A.K. HAIA, Judge of the District Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent Judge,
and
MERVINA CASH-KAEO, Respondent. ________________________________________________________________
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (1DRC-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the petition for writ of
mandamus, filed on October 24, 2022, and the record, Petitioners
have not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to relief
and a lack of alternative means to seek relief. An
extraordinary writ is not warranted. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91
Hawaiʻi 200, 204-05, 982 P.2d 334, 338-39 (1999). Accordingly, It is ordered that the petition is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, November 28, 2022.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Barrett v. Haia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrett-v-haia-haw-2022.