Barrett v. Haia
Opinion
Electronically Filed
Supreme Court
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
28-NOV-2022
12:04 PM
Dkt. 12 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
GUY BARRETT and RONETTE BARRETT, Petitioners, vs.
THE HONORABLE THOMAS A.K. HAIA, Judge of the District Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent Judge,
and
MERVINA CASH-KAEO, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
(1DRC-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus, filed on October 24, 2022, and the record, Petitioners have not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to seek relief. An extraordinary writ is not warranted. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawaiʻi 200, 204-05, 982 P.2d 334, 338-39 (1999). Accordingly,
It is ordered that the petition is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, November 28, 2022.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barrett v. Haia (Barrett v. Haia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.