Barrett v. Graham
19 Cal. 632
This text of 19 Cal. 632 (Barrett v. Graham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Barrett v. Graham, 19 Cal. 632 (Cal. 1862).
Opinion
—Field, C. J. concurring.
This is an appeal from an order setting aside two judgments obtained by the plaintiffs by default. The order was made upon conflicting affidavits, and we cannot undertake to say that an error has been committed. The grounds set forth in the affidavit on behalf of the defendants are sufficient to sustain the action of the Court.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kinkead v. Moriarty
136 N.W. 101 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1912)
Justice v. Ott
25 P. 691 (California Supreme Court, 1891)
Fox v. Minor
32 Cal. 111 (California Supreme Court, 1867)
Bailey v. Taaffe
29 Cal. 422 (California Supreme Court, 1866)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
19 Cal. 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrett-v-graham-cal-1862.