Barrett v. Graham
19 Cal. 632
Opinion
—Field, C. J. concurring.
This is an appeal from an order setting aside two judgments obtained by the plaintiffs by default. The order was made upon conflicting affidavits, and we cannot undertake to say that an error has been committed. The grounds set forth in the affidavit on behalf of the defendants are sufficient to sustain the action of the Court.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barrett v. Graham, 19 Cal. 632 (Cal. 1862).
19 Cal. 632 (Barrett v. Graham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kinkead v. Moriarty
136 N.W. 101 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1912)
Justice v. Ott
25 P. 691 (California Supreme Court, 1891)
Fox v. Minor
32 Cal. 111 (California Supreme Court, 1867)
Bailey v. Taaffe
29 Cal. 422 (California Supreme Court, 1866)