Barrett v. Flexmaster Industries, Inc.

410 So. 2d 658, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19424
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 9, 1982
DocketNo. 81-637
StatusPublished

This text of 410 So. 2d 658 (Barrett v. Flexmaster Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barrett v. Flexmaster Industries, Inc., 410 So. 2d 658, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19424 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial judge granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss on res judicata grounds. We reverse because it did not appear on the face of the complaint, see Brackett v. Usdan, 382 So.2d 105 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), nor, even considering the motion as one for summary judgment, from the attachments to the motion in the form of portions of earlier proceedings, that the issues asserted had previously been adjudicated adversely to the plaintiff so as to invoke the doctrine on its merits. See, Gordon v. Gordon, 160 Fla. [659]*659838, 36 So.2d 774 (1948); Crump v. Gold House Restaurants, Inc., 96 So.2d 215 (Fla.1957).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crump v. Gold House Restaurants
96 So. 2d 215 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)
Gordon v. Gordon
36 So. 2d 774 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1948)
Brackett v. Usdan
382 So. 2d 105 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
410 So. 2d 658, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrett-v-flexmaster-industries-inc-fladistctapp-1982.