Barrett v. Flexmaster Industries, Inc.

410 So. 2d 658, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19424
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 9, 1982·No. No. 81-637·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial judge granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss on res judicata grounds. We reverse because it did not appear on the face of the complaint, see Brackett v. Usdan, 382 So.2d 105 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), nor, even considering the motion as one for summary judgment, from the attachments to the motion in the form of portions of earlier proceedings, that the issues asserted had previously been adjudicated adversely to the plaintiff so as to invoke the doctrine on its merits. See, Gordon v. Gordon, 160 Fla. [659]*659838, 36 So.2d 774 (1948); Crump v. Gold House Restaurants, Inc., 96 So.2d 215 (Fla.1957).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barrett v. Flexmaster Industries, Inc., 410 So. 2d 658, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19424 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

410 So. 2d 658 (Barrett v. Flexmaster Industries, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crump v. Gold House Restaurants
96 So. 2d 215 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)
Gordon v. Gordon
36 So. 2d 774 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1948)
Brackett v. Usdan
382 So. 2d 105 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)