Barrett v. First National Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Barrett v. First National Bank

108 S.E. 66, 27 Ga. App. 257, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 807

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 30, 1921

Docket12429

StatusPublished

This text of 108 S.E. 66 (Barrett v. First National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barrett v. First National Bank, 108 S.E. 66, 27 Ga. App. 257, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 807 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

This is the third appearance here of this case. When the case first came to this court the judgment of the trial court was reversed because of error in repelling certain evidence offered by the defendant, and in directing a verdict for the plaintiff. 17 Ga. App. 425 (87 S. E. 602). On its second appearance, the judgment of the lower court was reversed because of error in admitting certain evidence offered by the defendant, and in directing a verdict for the defendant. 20 Ga. App. 493 (93 S. E. 107). Hpon the trial now under review the case was submitted to the jury, and the verdict in favor of the plaintiff, with the exception of the finding for attorney’s fees, was authorized by the evidence. The only assignment of error in the bill of ex[258]*258ceptions is upon the overruling of the motion for a new trial, and the motion contained only the usual general grounds. If the plaintiff, when the remittitur from this court is made the judgment of the lower court, will write off $23.64 — the amount found for attorney’s fees, the judgment will be affirmed; otherwise it will be reversed.

The costs of the writ of error are taxed against the defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed, on condition.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

This is the third appearance here of this case. When the case first came to this court the judgment of the trial court was reversed because of error in repelling certain evidence offered by the defendant, and in directing a verdict for the plaintiff. 17 Ga. App. 425 (87 S. E. 602). On its second appearance, the judgment of the lower court was reversed because of error in admitting certain evidence offered by the defendant, and in directing a verdict for the defendant. 20 Ga. App. 493 (93 S. E. 107). Hpon the trial now under review the case was submitted to the jury, and the verdict in favor of the plaintiff, with the exception of the finding for attorney’s fees, was authorized by the evidence. The only assignment of error in the bill of ex[258]*258ceptions is upon the overruling of the motion for a new trial, and the motion contained only the usual general grounds. If the plaintiff, when the remittitur from this court is made the judgment of the lower court, will write off $23.64 — the amount found for attorney’s fees, the judgment will be affirmed; otherwise it will be reversed.

The costs of the writ of error are taxed against the defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed, on condition.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 S.E. 66, 27 Ga. App. 257, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrett-v-first-national-bank-gactapp-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack