Barrett v. Carter Bros. & Co.

69 Miss. 593
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1891·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Cooper, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The bill having been dismissed as to the defendants, Sloan and Dulaney, they have no longer any interest in the litigation, and their motion to join in the appeal must be denied.

If there would otherwise have been merit in the objection taken to the jurisdiction of the court by the appellant, Barrett, it cannot now avail, for, by § 147 of the constitution, it is declared that “no judgment or decree in any chancery or circuit court, rendered in a civil cause, shall be reversed or annulled on the ground of want of jurisdiction to render said judgment or decree, from any error or mistake as to whether the cause in which it was rendered was of equity or common law jurisdiction.” There is no error in the decree,' as against Barrett, who alone appeals. He cannot assign for error matters affecting only the right of other defendants.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barrett v. Carter Bros. & Co., 69 Miss. 593 (Mich. 1891).

69 Miss. 593 (Barrett v. Carter Bros. & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tillotson v. Anders
551 So. 2d 212 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1989)
Duckworth v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.
150 So. 2d 163 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1963)
Planters Lumber Co. v. Plumbing Wholesale Co.
180 So. 793 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1938)
Witt v. Baars
36 Fla. 119 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1895)