Barrett v. Board of Commissioners
86 N.J.L. 675
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Minturn in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Bergen, Black, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Heppenheimer, Williams, JJ. 8.
For reversal — -Parker, J. 1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barrett v. Board of Commissioners, 86 N.J.L. 675 (N.J. 1914).
86 N.J.L. 675 (Barrett v. Board of Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Marshall Impeachment Case
69 A.2d 619 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1949)