Barrett v. Bloomfield Savings Institution

57 A. 1131, 66 N.J. Eq. 431, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 195

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 29, 1904·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney filed in • the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney,.Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray — -12.

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barrett v. Bloomfield Savings Institution, 57 A. 1131, 66 N.J. Eq. 431, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 195 (N.J. 1904).

Pincite

57 A. 1131 (Barrett v. Bloomfield Savings Institution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.