Barrett v. Bemelmans
This text of 26 A. 307 (Barrett v. Bemelmans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An examination of the affidavit of defence fully vindicates the action of the court below. The trustee seems by the statement and affidavit to have been appointed by the joint act of six owners of the real estate from which the rent accrues. The plaintiff alleges a revocation on her part. It is impossible to anticipate the showing that may be made, or to determine in advance the character and legal effect of the alleged revocation; but as the affidavit denies its effect upon the lease, and the [208]*208powers of the trustee, and alleges payment in full to him of the rent now demanded, the ease should go to trial.
The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 A. 307, 155 Pa. 204, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrett-v-bemelmans-pa-1893.