Barrett v. Al Charyn, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Barrett v. Al Charyn, Inc.

182 N.E.2d 282, 11 N.Y.2d 849

DecidedApril 5, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 182 N.E.2d 282 (Barrett v. Al Charyn, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barrett v. Al Charyn, Inc., 182 N.E.2d 282, 11 N.Y.2d 849 (N.Y. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Burke and Foster. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the ground that it appears that the death resulted solely from the intoxication of the injured employee while on duty (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 21, subd. 4). The autopsy revealed the presence of grain alcohol of 0.35% in his brain.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 N.E.2d 282, 11 N.Y.2d 849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrett-v-al-charyn-inc-ny-1962.