BARRETT ROBERT & WOODS, INC. v. Armi
299 S.E.2d 214, 307 N.C. 269, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1812
This text of 299 S.E.2d 214 (BARRETT ROBERT & WOODS, INC. v. Armi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
BARRETT ROBERT & WOODS, INC. v. Armi, 299 S.E.2d 214, 307 N.C. 269, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1812 (N.C. 1982).
Opinion
BARRETT, ROBERT & WOODS, INC.
v.
Clement Edson ARMI.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Powe, Porter & Alphin, Durham, for defendant.
Chambers, Ferguson, Watt, Wallas, Adkins & Fuller, Charlotte, for plaintiff.
Defendant's petition for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31. 59 N.C.App. 134, 296 S.E.2d 10. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Barrett, Robert & Woods, Inc. v. Armi
296 S.E.2d 10 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1982)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
299 S.E.2d 214, 307 N.C. 269, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrett-robert-woods-inc-v-armi-nc-1982.