Barrett Line, Inc. v. United States

S.D. Ohio

Barrett Line, Inc. v. United States

61 F. Supp. 464, 1944 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1540

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio

DecidedJuly 28, 1944

DocketNo. 881

StatusPublished

This text of 61 F. Supp. 464 (Barrett Line, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barrett Line, Inc. v. United States, 61 F. Supp. 464, 1944 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1540 (S.D. Ohio 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Court is of opinion that the Interstate Commerce Commission did not misconstrue the applicable statute, nor misapply it, and that its action herein has been in conformity with its statutory authority.

The order of the Commission was entered after a full and fair hearing. The Commission did not abuse its discretion, nor act arbitrarily in entering its order. The complaint herein should be dismissed at plaintiff’s costs.

The Court adopts as its own findings of fact and conclusions of law, without repetition here, the findings and conclusions of Division 4 of the Interstate Commerce Commission, as set forth in its decision June 18, 1943, in proceeding No. W-353, and the conclusion of the Interstate Commerce Commission in its order in the same proceeding entered on December 6, 1943.

Accordingly, the Court has entered an Order dismissing the complaint at plaintiff’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Court is of opinion that the Interstate Commerce Commission did not misconstrue the applicable statute, nor misapply it, and that its action herein has been in conformity with its statutory authority.

The order of the Commission was entered after a full and fair hearing. The Commission did not abuse its discretion, nor act arbitrarily in entering its order. The complaint herein should be dismissed at plaintiff’s costs.

The Court adopts as its own findings of fact and conclusions of law, without repetition here, the findings and conclusions of Division 4 of the Interstate Commerce Commission, as set forth in its decision June 18, 1943, in proceeding No. W-353, and the conclusion of the Interstate Commerce Commission in its order in the same proceeding entered on December 6, 1943.

Accordingly, the Court has entered an Order dismissing the complaint at plaintiff’s costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 F. Supp. 464, 1944 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrett-line-inc-v-united-states-ohsd-1944.