Barrett, Kilen Rashaan v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: August 14, 2003
• Docket: 14-02-01170-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

Affirmed and Opinion filed August 14, 2003

Affirmed and Opinion filed August 14, 2003.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-02-01170-CR

KILEN RASHAAN BARRETT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 263rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No.  898,843

M E M O R A N D U M  O P I N I O N

Appellant Kilen Bashaan Barrett pleaded guilty to the offense of aggravated robbery, and without an agreed recommendation for punishment, was sentenced to twelve years= incarceration in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice B Institutional Division.

Appellant's appointed counsel filed a brief in which she concludes that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  Appellant received the record on February 28, 2003, and was granted an extension of time to file his pro se response to June 30, 2003.  As of this date, no pro se response has been filed or a further extension requested.

We agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find no reversible error in the record. 

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Opinion filed August 14, 2003.

Panel consists of Justices Edelman, Frost, and Guzman.

Do Not Publish CTex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).