Barrett Firearms Manufacturing, Inc., Barrett Firearms USA, Inc., and Federal Cartridge Company v. Xavier Flores

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 19, 2022·No. 04-22-00136-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 19, 2022

No. 04-22-00136-CV

BARRETT FIREARMS MANUFACTURING, INC., Barrett Firearms USA, Inc., and Federal Cartridge Company, Appellants

v.

Xavier FLORES, Appellees

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2020-CI-17551 Honorable Richard Price, Judge Presiding

ORDER On July 27, 2022, appellant Federal Cartridge Company filed a “Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Anthony M. Pisciotti and Danny C. Lallis.” In the motion, Pisciotti and Lallis request permission from this court to appear pro hac vice to serve as appellate co-counsel for Federal Cartridge Company. The motion, however, does not comply with Rule 19(b) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar of Texas because it is not accompanied “by [a] motion of the resident practicing Texas attorney with whom the non-resident attorney[s] will be associated in the proceeding.” Accordingly, we deny the motion without prejudice to refiling with the required motion in support.

It is so ORDERED on August 19, 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barrett Firearms Manufacturing, Inc., Barrett Firearms USA, Inc., and Federal Cartridge Company v. Xavier Flores, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Barrett Firearms Manufacturing, Inc., Barrett Firearms USA, Inc., and Federal Cartridge Company v. Xavier Flores (Barrett Firearms Manufacturing, Inc., Barrett Firearms USA, Inc., and Federal Cartridge Company v. Xavier Flores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.